-
Greek Lessons
- Crossing Over: Aorist Participles, Narrative Flow, and the Motion of Matthew 9:1
- The Grammar of Pleading: Conditional Syntax and Subjunctive Permission in Matthew 8:31
- The Grammar of Silence: Commands, Purpose, and the Messianic Secret
- “What to Us and to You?”: Demonic Recognition and Eschatological Grammar in Matthew 8:29
- Whispers of Identity: From Prophets to Pronouns in Mark 8:28
-
Category
Author Archives: Advanced Greek Grammar
Self-Deification and the Syntax of Rebellion in 2 Thessalonians 2:4
Ὁ ἀντικείμενος καὶ ὑπεραιρόμενος ἐπὶ πάντα λεγόμενον Θεὸν ἢ σέβασμα, ὥστε αὐτὸν εἰς τὸν ναὸν τοῦ Θεοῦ καθίσαι, ἀποδεικνύντα ἑαυτὸν ὅτι ἔστι Θεός. (2 Thessalonians 2:4)
The one opposing and exalting himself over every so-called god or object of worship, so that he sits in the temple of God, displaying himself that he is God.
The Grammatical Portrait of the “Opposer”The subject, ὁ ἀντικείμενος (“the one who opposes”), is part of a grand participial construction describing the man of lawlessness. The definite article (ὁ) makes the participle substantival, turning it into a title or identifier—“The Opposer.” He is also described by the coordinate participle ὑπεραιρόμενος (“exalting himself”), which intensifies the portrait.… Learn Koine Greek
From Temple to Teaching: Grammatical Movement and Eschatological Signaling in Matthew 24:1
Καὶ ἐξελθὼν ὁ Ἰησοῦς ἐπορεύετο ἀπὸ τοῦ ἱεροῦ· καὶ προσῆλθον οἱ μαθηταὶ αὐτοῦ ἐπιδεῖξαι αὐτῷ τὰς οἰκοδομὰς τοῦ ἱεροῦ. (Matthew 24:1)
And Jesus went out and was going away from the temple; and his disciples came to show him the buildings of the temple.
Turning from the Temple: Narrative and Theological Context of Matthew 24:1This verse opens what is commonly referred to as the “Olivet Discourse” (Matt. 24–25), Jesus’ longest eschatological teaching in Matthew. The narrative shift marked here is not merely physical but symbolic: Jesus leaves the temple and enters into a prophetic discourse concerning its future destruction. The grammar of Matthew 24:1 encodes movement, emphasis, and narrative foreshadowing through participial constructions, compound verbs of motion, and the emphatic placement of subjects.… Learn Koine Greek
Clarity in the Coming Age: A Greek Look at 1 Corinthians 13:12
Βλέπομεν γὰρ ἄρτι δι’ ἐσόπτρου ἐν αἰνίγματι, τότε δὲ πρόσωπον πρὸς πρόσωπον· ἄρτι γινώσκω ἐκ μέρους, τότε δὲ ἐπιγνώσομαι καθὼς καὶ ἐπεγνώσθην. (1 Corinthians 13:12)
For now we see through a mirror in a riddle, but then face to face; now I know in part, but then I will fully know, just as I also was fully known.
The Grammar of Contrast: Now vs. Then This verse is structured around two temporal contrasts: ἄρτι (“now”) and τότε (“then”). Paul uses this duality to highlight the present limitations of human perception and the future fullness of eschatological knowledge. The parallel structure enhances rhetorical rhythm and theological clarity.… Learn Koine GreekThe Mark That Restricts: Economic Control in Revelation 13:17
Καὶ ἵνα μή τις δύνηται ἀγοράσαι ἢ πωλῆσαι εἰ μὴ ὁ ἔχων τὸ χάραγμα, τὸ ὄνομα τοῦ θηρίου ἢ τὸν ἀριθμὸν τοῦ ὀνόματος αὐτοῦ. (Revelation 13:17)
And so that no one is able to buy or sell except the one who has the mark: the name of the beast or the number of its name.
Revelation 13:17 describes an oppressive system in which participation in the economy is limited to those who bear the mark of the beast. The Greek syntax reinforces the exclusivity and coercion built into this apocalyptic scenario. It is precise, juridical, and chilling in tone, establishing boundaries on action and identity.… Learn Koine Greek
The King Who Saw—and Yet Did Not See: A Study in Vision and Desire
In the shadowed drama of Jesus’ trial before Pilate and Herod, Luke 23:8 offers a moment both fleeting and revealing. Here, we find Herod Antipas, tetrarch of Galilee, encountering Jesus for the first time. The verse records not just an act of seeing, but a complex interplay of expectation, longing, and narrative irony.
ὁ δὲ Ἡρῴδης ἰδὼν τὸν Ἰησοῦν ἐχάρη λίαν· ἦν γὰρ ἐξ ἱκανοῦ θέλων ἰδεῖν αὐτὸν διὰ τὸ ἀκούειν αὐτὸν πολλὰ περὶ αὐτοῦ, καὶ ἤλπιζέ τι σημεῖον ἰδεῖν ὑπ’ αὐτοῦ γινόμενον.This single sentence pulses with grammatical richness—particularly in its use of participles and infinitives that layer meaning onto the act of seeing and desiring.… Learn Koine Greek
The Refreshment of Love: Perfect Tense and Persuasion in Philemon 7
Χάριν γὰρ ἔχομεν πολλὴν καὶ παράκλησιν ἐπὶ τῇ ἀγάπῃ σου, ὅτι τὰ σπλάγχνα τῶν ἁγίων ἀναπέπαυται διὰ σοῦ, ἀδελφέ. (Philemon 7)
For we have much grace and encouragement because of your love, because the hearts of the saints have been refreshed through you, brother.
The Context of the LetterIn Philemon 7, Paul expresses gratitude for the love of Philemon, acknowledging how his actions have refreshed the hearts of the saints. The Greek is carefully crafted: χάριν γὰρ ἔχομεν πολλὴν καὶ παράκλησιν ἐπὶ τῇ ἀγάπῃ σου, ὅτι τὰ σπλάγχνα τῶν ἁγίων ἀναπέπαυται διὰ σοῦ, ἀδελφέ. This single sentence combines thanksgiving, encouragement, and theological depth.… Learn Koine Greek
Hope, Resurrection, and Divided Councils: Participles and Predicate Focus in Acts 23:6
γνοὺς δὲ ὁ Παῦλος ὅτι τὸ ἓν μέρος ἐστὶ Σαδδουκαίων, τὸ δὲ ἕτερον Φαρισαίων, ἔκραξεν ἐν τῷ συνεδρίῳ· Ἄνδρες ἀδελφοί, ἐγὼ Φαρισαῖός εἰμι, υἱὸς Φαρισαίου· περὶ ἐλπίδος καὶ ἀναστάσεως νεκρῶν ἐγὼ κρίνομαι. (Acts 23:6)
Strategic Grammar in a Divided Sanhedrin
In Acts 23:6, Paul masterfully navigates a volatile courtroom. Surrounded by hostile parties, he declares a theological truth — and simultaneously ignites division between Pharisees and Sadducees. His speech is both true and tactically brilliant.
The grammar of this verse reveals Paul’s rhetorical control. Let us examine:
The use of an aorist participle to mark perceptive awareness An equative verb of being split across parallel clauses A historic present for dramatic emphasis Predicate placement for emphasis A genitive complement construction with κρίνομαιThis verse is an exemplary study in how grammar serves theology, rhetoric, and narrative all at once.… Learn Koine Greek
Say but Do Not Do: Grammatical Structure and Ethical Critique in Matthew 23:3
Πάντα οὖν ὅσα ἐὰν εἴπωσιν ὑμῖν τηρεῖν, τηρεῖτε καὶ ποιεῖτε, κατὰ δὲ τὰ ἔργα αὐτῶν μὴ ποιεῖτε· λέγουσι γὰρ, καὶ οὐ ποιοῦσι. (Matthew 23:3)
Therefore, all that they tell you to observe, observe and do; but do not do according to their works, for they say and do not do.
Instruction and Inconsistency: Literary and Theological Context of Matthew 23:3This verse introduces Jesus’ denunciation of the scribes and Pharisees in Matthew 23, a chapter often labeled the “Seven Woes.” It encapsulates Jesus’ critique of religious hypocrisy: verbal instruction without practical obedience. The syntax of Matthew 23:3 juxtaposes imperative obedience to authoritative teaching with prohibition against imitating hypocritical behavior.… Learn Koine Greek
Grammatical Dissection: A Prohibition and Its Antidote
Μηδὲν κατὰ ἐριθείαν ἢ κενοδοξίαν, ἀλλὰ τῇ ταπεινοφροσύνῃ ἀλλήλους ἡγούμενοι ὑπερέχοντας ἑαυτῶν (Philippians 2:3)
Do nothing from selfish ambition or vain glory, but in humility considering one another as surpassing yourselves.
Negative Exhortation: μηδὲν κατὰ ἐριθείαν ἢ κενοδοξίαν μηδὲν: Accusative singular neuter of μηδείς, functioning adverbially — “nothing.” This modifies the understood verb (from v.2), likely “do” or “think.” κατὰ: Preposition with accusative — “according to,” expressing motivation or manner. ἐριθείαν: Accusative singular feminine — “selfish ambition,” “factiousness,” often connoting rivalry or party spirit. ἢ: Disjunctive conjunction — “or.” κενοδοξίαν: Accusative singular feminine — “vain glory,” “empty pride,” combining κενός (“empty”) and δόξα (“glory”).… Learn Koine GreekWe Found This Man: Participles of Accusation in the Trial of Jesus
Ἤρξαντο δὲ κατηγορεῖν αὐτοῦ λέγοντες· τοῦτον εὕρομεν διαστρέφοντα τὸ ἔθνος καὶ κωλύοντα Καίσαρι φόρους διδόναι, λέγοντα ἑαυτὸν Χριστὸν βασιλέα εἶναι. (Luke 23:2)
The Opening Accusation: Legal Framing and Participial Precision
Luke 23:2 presents the fabricated charges brought against Jesus before Pontius Pilate. The religious leaders transition from theological opposition to political accusation. Their language is carefully crafted to stir Roman concern. But in the Greek, Luke lays bare the structure of the lie: a series of accusatory participles anchored to the verb εὕρομεν (“we found”). The grammar reveals how layered, methodical, and falsely legal the attack truly is.
Initiating the Charge: ἤρξαντο δὲ κατηγορεῖν αὐτοῦ λέγοντεςἤρξαντο… κατηγορεῖν “And they began to accuse him”
ἤρξαντο is the aorist middle indicative, 3rd person plural of ἄρχομαι — “they began.”… Learn Koine Greek