-
Greek Lessons
- Declensions of Blessing: Case Usage in Matthew 10:12
- Grammatical Resistance: Pharaoh’s Syntax of Control in Exodus 10:11
- The Accusation in Quotation: Pauline Perception and Koine Rhetoric
- Healing and Heralding: The Grammar of Kingdom Nearness
- The Word Near You: Syntax, Faith, and the Internalization of Truth in Romans 10:8
-
Category
Author Archives: Biblical Greek
Synonyms: Malice in the Heart: κακία and κακοήθεια in the Greek New Testament
Two Greek words—κακία and κακοήθεια—provide insight into the inner world of moral corruption in the New Testament. While both relate to evil or badness, their applications are distinct. κακία denotes general moral depravity or wickedness in character. κακοήθεια, however, highlights malicious intent—particularly a disposition of evil-thinking or malevolence toward others. This article traces their usage, meaning, and theological significance within the biblical framework of sin and transformation.
Lexical Definitions and Word Origins κακία – Derived from the adjective κακός (“bad,” “evil”), this noun denotes badness, wickedness, or moral evil. It is a broad term encompassing moral corruption, harmful behavior, and general opposition to the good.… Learn Koine GreekLike Nonsense: Grammatical Dismissal and Resurrection Doubt in Luke 24:11
Words Dismissed: Literary and Theological Context of Luke 24:11
Luke 24:11 — καὶ ἐφάνησαν ἐνώπιον αὐτῶν ὡσεὶ λῆρος τὰ ῥήματα αὐτῶν, καὶ ἠπίστουν αὐταῖς. (“And their words appeared to them as nonsense, and they did not believe them.”)
This verse captures the initial reaction of the apostles to the report of the women who witnessed the empty tomb and angelic proclamation of Jesus’ resurrection. It stands as a moment of ironic inversion: those who are closest to Jesus and trained by him to expect his resurrection dismiss the testimony of the first witnesses. Luke’s narrative choice to present women as the first bearers of the resurrection news—and the disciples’ rejection of it—carries theological weight and is linguistically intensified through specific grammatical constructions.… Learn Koine Greek
Imperatives and Participles in Motion: Joseph’s Command in Genesis 45:9 LXX
Σπεύσαντες οὖν ἀνάβητε πρὸς τὸν πατέρα μου καὶ εἴπατε αὐτῷ τάδε λέγει ὁ υἱός σου Ιωσηφ ἐποίησέν με ὁ θεὸς κύριον πάσης γῆς Αἰγύπτου κατάβηθι οὖν πρός με καὶ μὴ μείνῃς (Genesis 45:9 LXX)
Hasten, therefore, go up to my father and say to him, “Thus says your son Ioseph: God has made me lord of all the land of Egypt. Come down, therefore, to me, and do not delay.”
Grammar that UrgesWhen Joseph reveals himself to his brothers, his words cascade with urgency. The verse employs a participle plus imperatives (σπεύσαντες … ἀνάβητε), direct speech formulae (τάδε λέγει), and a final pair of commands (κατάβηθι … μὴ μείνῃς).… Learn Koine Greek
Temporal Particles and the Rhythm of Pursuit: ἐξελθόντων and the Syntax of Suspense in Genesis 44:4
We now enter the dramatic corridor of Joseph’s final test upon his brothers—a moment thick with irony, emotion, and grammatical precision. In this pivotal verse from Genesis, the LXX translator crafts a scene that hinges not only on action but on timing, using participle form and temporal syntax to shape tension and narrative rhythm.
ἐξελθόντων δὲ αὐτῶν τὴν πόλιν οὐκ ἀπέσχον μακράν καὶ Ιωσηφ εἶπεν τῷ ἐπὶ τῆς οἰκίας αὐτοῦ ἀναστὰς ἐπιδίωξον ὀπίσω τῶν ἀνθρώπων καὶ καταλήμψῃ αὐτοὺς καὶ ἐρεῖς αὐτοῖς τί ὅτι ἀνταπεδώκατε πονηρὰ ἀντὶ καλῶνThis verse marks the turning point in Joseph’s emotional trial—his silver cup is sent after his brothers, and their return is engineered through language that blends urgency, accusation, and moral inversion.… Learn Koine Greek
Wisdom on Display: Subjunctive Clauses, Demonstratives, and Divine Reputation
Καὶ φυλάξεσθε καὶ ποιήσετε ὅτι αὕτη ἡ σοφία ὑμῶν καὶ ἡ σύνεσις ἐναντίον πάντων τῶν ἐθνῶν ὅσοι ἐὰν ἀκούσωσιν πάντα τὰ δικαιώματα ταῦτα καὶ ἐροῦσιν ἰδοὺ λαὸς σοφὸς καὶ ἐπιστήμων τὸ ἔθνος τὸ μέγα τοῦτο (Deuteronomy 4:6 LXX)
The Command and Its Consequence
This verse is an exhortation with deep theological and grammatical architecture. It commands Israel to obey the statutes of YHWH — not merely for inward holiness, but for a powerful external witness among the nations. The Greek Septuagint captures this with complex subordinate structures and precise use of demonstratives, subjunctives, and predicate nouns.
The central exhortation comes in the twin imperatives: – φυλάξεσθε — “You shall guard” – ποιήσετε — “You shall do”
These aorist middle imperatives address not just passive preservation, but active obedience to divine instruction.… Learn Koine Greek
In the Beginning, a Definite Beginning: The Grammar of Articles, Cases, and Cosmic Syntax
ἐν ἀρχῇ ἐποίησεν ὁ θεὸς τὸν οὐρανὸν καὶ τὴν γῆν (Genesis 1:1 LXX)
The Opening Word: A Dative Without an Article
The phrase ἐν ἀρχῇ begins the Septuagint with a striking grammatical choice — a preposition ἐν followed by a dative singular feminine noun ἀρχῇ, meaning “beginning.” Notably, it lacks a definite article, unlike its classical counterpart ἐν τῇ ἀρχῇ which would be expected in Attic prose.
This anarthrous use opens interpretive and theological space. Grammatically, the omission likely reflects Semitic influence, mirroring the Hebrew בְּרֵאשִׁית (bəreshit), which is likewise without an article. Linguistically, it signals an absolute beginning — not just a specific, known beginning in time, but the very commencement of time itself.… Learn Koine Greek
Posted in Septuagint Greek
Leave a comment
Memory and Moral Imperative: The Imperative of Recollection in Deuteronomy 24:9
Μνήσθητι ὅσα ἐποίησεν Κύριος ὁ Θεός σου τῇ Μαριαμ ἐν τῇ ὁδῷ ἐκπορευομένων ὑμῶν ἐξ Αἰγύπτου (Deuteronomy 24:9)
Remember what the LORD your God did to Miriam on the way, when you were coming out of Egypt.
We turn now to the wilderness road, where memory is not merely a faculty of the mind but a covenantal obligation. In this verse from Deuteronomy, uttered in the final discourse of Moses, we encounter a command that binds divine action to human recollection. It is a summons to remember, and through that remembrance, to learn.
This verse issues a directive that intertwines theological history with ethical formation.… Learn Koine Greek
She Happened Upon It: Lexical Irony and the Grammar of Divine Providence
Καὶ ἐπορεύθη καὶ συνέλεξεν ἐν τῷ ἀγρῷ κατόπισθεν τῶν θεριζόντων καὶ περιέπεσεν περιπτώματι τῇ μερίδι τοῦ ἀγροῦ Βοος τοῦ ἐκ συγγενείας Αβιμελεχ (Ruth 2:3 LXX)
A Grammatical “Coincidence”
Ruth 2:3 in the Septuagint masterfully describes what appears to be a chance event — Ruth ending up in Boaz’s field — with language that grammatically suggests randomness but theologically signals providence. The key lies in the lexical choice of περιέπεσεν περιπτώματι and the carefully structured dative expressions that frame divine orchestration through ordinary grammar.
Καὶ ἐπορεύθη καὶ συνέλεξεν ἐν τῷ ἀγρῷ — Routine Action, Routinized Syntax Two Aorist Indicatives: ἐπορεύθη: aorist passive (deponent) indicative, 3rd person singular of πορεύομαι — “she went” συνέλεξεν: aorist active indicative, 3rd person singular of συλλέγω — “she gathered”The combination is mundane: Ruth went and gathered — simple actions of gleaning.… Learn Koine Greek
When the Verb Speaks Judgment: Future, Aorist, and the Theology of Response in Isaiah 65:12 LXX
Ἐγὼ παραδώσω ὑμᾶς εἰς μάχαιραν πάντες ἐν σφαγῇ πεσεῖσθε ὅτι ἐκάλεσα ὑμᾶς καὶ οὐχ ὑπηκούσατε ἐλάλησα καὶ παρηκούσατε καὶ ἐποιήσατε τὸ πονηρὸν ἐναντίον ἐμοῦ καὶ ἃ οὐκ ἐβουλόμην ἐξελέξασθε (Isaiah 65:12 LXX)
A Chain of Clauses with Grammatical Progression
This verse unfolds as a sequence of clauses that move from a future prophetic threat to a retrospective indictment. The transition of tenses—from the future indicative to multiple aorist indicatives—is not random; it serves to contrast what will come with what has already transpired. The grammar sharpens the theological edge of the prophecy: the future judgment is certain because the past responses to God’s calls have been persistently disobedient.… Learn Koine Greek
Grammar at the Breaking Point: When Syntax Yields to Tears
Καὶ οὐκ ἠδύνατο Ιωσηφ ἀνέχεσθαι πάντων τῶν παρεστηκότων αὐτῷ ἀλλ᾽ εἶπεν ἐξαποστείλατε πάντας ἀπ᾽ ἐμοῦ καὶ οὐ παρειστήκει οὐδεὶς ἔτι τῷ Ιωσηφ ἡνίκα ἀνεγνωρίζετο τοῖς ἀδελφοῖς αὐτοῦ (Genesis 45:1 LXX)
In this emotionally charged verse from Genesis 45:1 LXX, we encounter a unique layering of participial and finite verb forms that collectively express psychological rupture, narrative suspense, and social movement. The opening phrase, οὐκ ἠδύνατο, employs the imperfect tense to show an ongoing inability—a durative struggle within Joseph. The infinitive ἀνέχεσθαι, governed by ἠδύνατο, provides the content of that inability: Joseph could no longer restrain himself. The genitive plural πάντων τῶν παρεστηκότων combines a genitive absolute force with a perfect participle, describing those who were “standing around him” as an ongoing state—reinforcing that their presence was continual and oppressive.… Learn Koine Greek
