-
Greek Lessons
- Vindicated at the Table: How Speech Condemns and Grammar Acquits
- Carried, Not Carrying: The Grammar That Topples Boasting
- Spliced into Abundance: The Grammar of Displacement and Participation in ἐνεκεντρίσθης
- When the Heart Expands Toward Ruin: The Grammar of Self-Watchfulness
- Living, Begetting, Dying: The Grammar of Time and Continuity
-
Category
Category Archives: Grammar
“ἐξετίθετο”: The Imperfect Middle of Reasoned Defense in Acts 11:4
Ἀρξάμενος δὲ ὁ Πέτρος ἐξετίθετο αὐτοῖς καθεξῆς, λέγων· (Acts 11:4)
But Peter, having begun, began to explain to them in order, saying,
Unfolding the AccountThe main verb here is ἐξετίθετο, from ἐκτίθημι, meaning “to set forth, to explain, to lay out systematically.” The imperfect middle indicative form is rich with nuance, portraying continuous, personal, and deliberate exposition. Luke employs this verb in settings that involve careful explanation, reasoned defense, or theological instruction.
Morphological and Semantic Breakdown ἐξετίθετο – Root: ἐκτίθημι ; Form: imperfect middle indicative, 3rd person singular; Tense: imperfect (past, ongoing action); Voice: middle (emphasizes the subject’s engagement in the act); Mood: indicative (factual); Translation: “he was explaining,” “he laid out.”… Learn Koine Greek“Ἀρξάμενος… ἐξετίθετο”: Participial Introduction and Imperfect Exposition in Acts 11:4
Ἀρξάμενος δὲ ὁ Πέτρος ἐξετίθετο αὐτοῖς καθεξῆς, λέγων·
But Peter, having begun, explained to them in order, saying,
Here, we’ll examine the aorist middle participle ἀρξάμενος and how it works with the imperfect middle verb ἐξετίθετο, along with the adverb καθεξῆς. This construction is a classic example of narrative initiation in Greek storytelling—where a main action is preceded by a temporal participle that adds flow, continuity, and emphasis.
Peter Begins to SpeakActs 11:4 sets the stage for Peter’s explanatory defense before the Jerusalem believers:
Ἀρξάμενος δὲ ὁ Πέτρος ἐξετίθετο αὐτοῖς καθεξῆς, λέγων·
“But Peter, having begun, explained to them in order, saying,…”
This combination of aorist participle + imperfect main verb is a standard literary pattern in narrative Greek.… Learn Koine Greek
“οὐκ ἔλαβον μεθ’ ἑαυτῶν ἔλαιον”: Aorist Negation and Reflexive Emphasis in Matthew 25:3
Αἵτινες μωραὶ, λαβοῦσαι τὰς λαμπάδας αὐτῶν, οὐκ ἔλαβον μεθ’ ἑαυτῶν ἔλαιον. (Matthew 25:3)
Introduction: What They Failed to Bring
The final clause in this verse exposes the foolish virgins’ core mistake: οὐκ ἔλαβον μεθ’ ἑαυτῶν ἔλαιον — “they did not take oil with themselves.”
The verb ἔλαβον {elabon} is aorist active, and the phrase μεθ’ ἑαυτῶν is a reflexive dative with preposition, highlighting not just absence, but the absence-in-context: they brought lamps, but no oil along with them. The sentence structure masterfully captures the appearance of readiness without inner provision.
Let us explore the final clause of Matthew 25:3:
οὐκ ἔλαβον μεθ’ ἑαυτῶν ἔλαιον — “they did not take oil with themselves.”… Learn Koine Greek
“λαβοῦσαι τὰς λαμπάδας αὐτῶν”: Aorist Participial Sequence in Matthew 25:3
Αἵτινες μωραὶ, λαβοῦσαι τὰς λαμπάδας αὐτῶν, οὐκ ἔλαβον μεθ’ ἑαυτῶν ἔλαιον. (Matthew 25:3)
Those who were foolish, having taken their lamps, did not take oil with themselves.
Introduction: What They Took—And What They Didn’tHere we focus on the participial clause λαβοῦσαι τὰς λαμπάδας αὐτῶν—a grammatically elegant way to show sequence and preparation. This action, though correct on the surface, becomes the setup for what was lacking. The participle describes temporal precedence: what they did before failing to take oil.
λαβοῦσαι τὰς λαμπάδας αὐτῶν — “having taken their lamps.”
This is a classic example of a temporal aorist participial construction in Greek.… Learn Koine Greek
“Αἵτινες μωραὶ…”: Indefinite Relative Classification in Matthew 25:3
Αἵτινες μωραὶ, λαβοῦσαι τὰς λαμπάδας αὐτῶν, οὐκ ἔλαβον μεθ’ ἑαυτῶν ἔλαιον. (Matthew 25:3)
Those who were foolish, having taken their lamps, did not take oil with them.
Introduction: Those Who Were FoolishIn Matthew 25:3, part of Jesus’ parable of the Ten Virgins, the foolish group is introduced with the phrase: Αἵτινες μωραὶ, λαβοῦσαι τὰς λαμπάδας αὐτῶν, οὐκ ἔλαβον μεθ’ ἑαυτῶν ἔλαιον.
The use of αἵτινες instead of the regular relative αἵ gives the clause a classifying tone, functioning like “such as were foolish.” Grammatically, it creates a restrictive and descriptive clause that labels this subgroup of virgins and signals their defining characteristic: lack of preparation.… Learn Koine Greek
“ἐγένετο” as Divine Narrative Marker: The Aorist Middle in John 2:1
Καὶ τῇ ἡμέρᾳ τῇ τρίτῃ γάμος ἐγένετο ἐν Κανὰ τῆς Γαλιλαίας, καὶ ἦν ἡ μήτηρ τοῦ Ἰησοῦ ἐκεῖ. (John 2:1)
And on the third day, a wedding took place in Cana of Galilee, and the mother of Jesus was there.
John 2:1 opens the narrative of the wedding at Kana with a subtle but theologically rich description. For this lesson, we’ll focus on the aorist middle indicative form ἐγένετο (“there was” or “it happened”), a verb that often signals narrative transition, divine appointment, or the unfolding of significant events in Johannine literature.
Introduction: The Beginning of SignsJohn 2:1 begins with an event introduction: “Καὶ τῇ ἡμέρᾳ τῇ τρίτῃ γάμος ἐγένετο”—“And on the third day there was a wedding.”… Learn Koine Greek
Greek Grammar Lesson from John 3:16
Οὕτω γὰρ ἠγάπησεν ὁ Θεὸς τὸν κόσμον, ὥστε τὸν υἱὸν αὐτοῦ τὸν μονογενῆ ἔδωκεν, ἵνα πᾶς ὁ πιστεύων εἰς αὐτὸν μὴ ἀπόληται ἀλλ’ ἔχῃ ζωὴν αἰώνιον. (John 3:16)
For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, so that everyone who believes in him should not perish but have eternal life.
Focus Topic: The ἵνα-Clause and the Subjunctive MoodThis verse presents a powerful example of the use of ἵνα introducing a purpose/result clause followed by two verbs in the subjunctive mood. This structure is both grammatically elegant and theologically rich.
Explanation of the Subjunctive MoodIn Koine Greek, the subjunctive mood expresses possibility, intention, or result.… Learn Koine Greek
No One Annuls or Adds: Greek Grammar and the Inviolability of a Covenant
Ἀδελφοί, κατὰ ἄνθρωπον λέγω· ὅμως ἀνθρώπου κεκυρωμένην διαθήκην οὐδεὶς ἀθετεῖ ἢ ἐπιδιατάσσεται (Galatians 3:15)
“Brothers, I speak according to human terms: even a human covenant, once ratified, no one nullifies or adds to.”
In this introductory statement to a deeper argument on the Abrahamic promise, Paul appeals to a human analogy. The Greek in Galatians 3:15 — Ἀδελφοί, κατὰ ἄνθρωπον λέγω· ὅμως ἀνθρώπου κεκυρωμένην διαθήκην οὐδεὶς ἀθετεῖ ἢ ἐπιδιατάσσεται — uses legal vocabulary, perfect participles, and third-person indicatives to argue that even human covenants, once ratified, are considered binding. Paul’s logic is grammatical as well as theological: if human agreements are permanent, how much more God’s covenant with Abraham?… Learn Koine Greek
Divine Intention and Participial Purpose in Matthew 3:13: A Greek Grammatical and Theological Analysis
Τότε παραγίνεται ὁ Ἰησοῦς ἀπὸ τῆς Γαλιλαίας ἐπὶ τὸν Ἰορδάνην πρὸς τὸν Ἰωάννην τοῦ βαπτισθῆναι ὑπ’ αὐτοῦ. (Matthew 3:13)
Then Jesus comes from Galilee to the Jordan to John, to be baptized by him.
Matthew 3:13 introduces the solemn moment when ὁ Ἰησοῦς voluntarily approaches ὁ Ἰωάννης to be baptized. The verse’s Greek structure reveals deliberate verbal sequencing and spatial-temporal framing that underscore intentionality and submission. This analysis will explore the grammatical details of the present middle deponent verb παραγίνεται, the genitive articular infinitive τοῦ βαπτισθῆναι, and the directional prepositional phrases that structure the sentence semantically and theologically.
Temporal Coordination: Τότε– Τότε is an adverb meaning “then” or “at that time.”… Learn Koine Greek
“γέγραπται” as Scriptural Formula: The Perfect Passive Indicative in Mark 1:2
Ὡς γέγραπται ἐν τοῖς προφήταις· ἰδού, ἐγὼ ἀποστέλλω τὸν ἄγγελόν μου πρὸ προσώπου σου, ὃς κατασκευάσει τὴν ὁδόν σου ἔμπροσθέν σου.
(Mark 1:2)
In this verse, the phrase ὡς γέγραπται ἐν τοῖς προφήταις introduces a prophetic citation. For this lesson, we will focus on the perfect passive indicative form γέγραπται and its formulaic, theological, and grammatical function in scriptural citation.
The Authority of What “Is Written”In Mark 1:2, the evangelist introduces a prophetic quotation with the phrase ὡς γέγραπται ἐν τοῖς προφήταις — “As it is written in the prophets.” The central verb γέγραπται, from γράφω, appears in the perfect passive indicative, a tense-voice-mood combination with both grammatical precision and theological weight.… Learn Koine Greek
